Is a Business Owner or Landlord Responsible for a Slip and Fall?

Small business owners typically lease rather than own the property where their business is located. The owner of that property often is an entirely different business entity and may own several other commercial properties.

This raises many questions: Who should be held liable if you suffer a slip and fall at a business where the business owner does not own the property? Should you sue the business owner, who is the tenant? Or should you sue the property owner, who is the landlord? Should you sue both?

Here, we explore those questions, using New York premises liability law as an example.

What Does the Law Say About Premises Liability in Slip and Fall Cases?

To prevail in a slip and fall lawsuit in New York, a plaintiff typically must prove three things:

  • The plaintiff was on the property lawfully. For instance, the plaintiff could show that he or she was on the business property as a customer. Generally speaking, a property owner owes the highest duty of care to those who visit the property for the owner’s benefit.
  • The owner or lessee of the property was negligent in either failing to repair an unsafe condition or failing to warn about it. For instance, the business owner may mop the floors, leave those floors in a slippery, dangerous condition and fail to put up a “wet floor” warning sign for visitors.
  • The owner’s or lessee’s negligence caused the plaintiff’s injury. For example, a customer may suffer a hip fracture due to a fall on a slippery floor (which, in turn, leads to extensive medical treatment, missed time at work, pain, suffering and other damages.)

Thus, in New York, both a business owner who leases property where a slip and fall occurred (tenant) and the actual owner of the property (landlord) could both be held liable. Thus, you could arguably sue one or both parties in a slip and fall lawsuit.

Who Can You Collect Damages from in a Slip and Fall Claim?

Additionally, New York is a joint and several liability state. This means that a plaintiff could collect slip and fall damages from one or both parties. For instance, the plaintiff in a slip and fall claim could collect the entire amount from just the property owner. (In a separate action, the property owner could then seek “contribution” from the business owner/tenant.)

a>

However, New York has an exception to this rule: If a party’s liability is 50 percent of the combined fault, the party would be severally liable for only the plaintiff’s non-economic losses.

Additionally, like many states, New York follows the doctrine of pure comparative negligence. If a plaintiff is partially at fault for his or her injuries, including those injuries suffered in a slip and fall, the plaintiff can still recover damages. However, those damages are reduced in proportion to the amount of fault attributed to the plaintiff.

As you can see, premises liability can be a complex area of the law, especially when the incident occurs at a business which is owned by a party other than the business owner.

For this reason, you should always consult with an experienced personal injury lawyer when seeking compensation for the harm suffered in a slip and fall.

About The Author
Jacob Maslow The owner and editor of Legal Scoops, Jacob Maslow, has founded several online newspapers including Daily Forex Report and Conservative Free Press. He works as an Online Marketing Consultant for Consultwebs, providing web marketing services for several attorneys. 

Reply